ARTICLE
24 December 2020

Analysis Of OIG's New And Revised Regulatory Safe Harbors To The Federal Health Care Program Anti-Kickback Statute And Beneficiary Inducement Prohibition

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
In our November 25, 2000 Healthcare Law Blog article, "Big Changes for Health Care Fraud and Abuse: HHS Gifts Providers Updates to the Stark Law and the AKS, Just in Time for the Holidays,"...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In our November 25, 2000 Healthcare Law Blog article, "Big Changes for Health Care Fraud and Abuse: HHS Gifts Providers Updates to the Stark Law and the AKS, Just in Time for the Holidays," we discussed the advanced publication of two significant final rules intended to "modernize" and "clarify" regulations regarding the Physician Self-Referral Law ("Stark Law Final Rule") and the Anti-Kickback Statute ("AKS Final Rule") - both formally published on December 2, 2020 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") and the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General ("OIG"), respectively.

Previously, Sheppard Mullin released its "Critical Analysis and Practical Implications of CMS' Changes to the Stark Law's Implementing Regulations" discussing the Stark Law Final Rule and the significant changes the Stark Law Final Rule made to the Stark Law exceptions and other provisions included in the Stark Law regulations at 42 C.F.R. 411.351 et seq.

As linked to this article, Sheppard Mullin presents its, "Analysis of OIG's New and Revised Regulatory Safe Harbors to the Federal Health Care Program Anti-Kickback Statute and Beneficiary Inducement Prohibition" (the "AKS Analysis"). The AKS Analysis includes a deep-dive into the AKS Final Rule including the addition of new AKS safe harbors for remuneration exchanged under various value-based arrangements, a new safe harbor applicable to financial arrangements designed to benefit program beneficiaries, and the revision of other AKS safe harbors to add compliance flexibility as deemed necessary to accommodate value-based arrangements.

Taken as a whole, the AKS Final Rule and the Stark Law Final Rule are further evidence that traditional Medicare and Medicaid fee-for-service reimbursement methodologies continue to be marginalized by payment systems designed to incentivize and reward patient care quality and efficiency. As reimbursement methodologies change and the desire for greater innovation in the area of healthcare payment systems increases, CMS and the OIG are recognizing that the AKS and Stark Law regulations need to change too.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More