ARTICLE
15 December 2020

Critical Analysis And Practical Implications Of CMS' Changes To The Stark Law's Implementing Regulations

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
As mentioned in our November 25, 2000 Healthcare Law Blog article, "Big Changes for Health Care Fraud and Abuse: HHS Gifts Providers Updates to the Stark Law and the AKS, Just in Time...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As mentioned in our November 25, 2000 Healthcare Law Blog article, " Big Changes for Health Care Fraud and Abuse: HHS Gifts Providers Updates to the Stark Law and the AKS, Just in Time for the Holidays," the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule ("Final Rule") on December 2, 2020 making significant changes to the regulatory framework implementing the federal physician self-referral prohibition (the "Stark Law"), 42 C.F.R. 411.351 et seq.

Sheppard Mullin is pleased to now present "Critical Analysis and Practical Implications of CMS' Changes to the Stark Law's Implementing Regulations" (" Critical Analysis"), a comprehensive analysis of the Final Rule.  This Critical Analysis is designed not as an alert or summary of the Final Rule, but rather as a comprehensive examination of the Final Rule and the changes made to the Stark Law regulations through the Final Rule.  In addition, the Critical Analysis compares the regulatory changes as originally proposed by CMS in its October 17, 2019 proposed rule to those changes that were finalized in the Final Rule.  Finally, the Critical Analysis includes a thorough analysis of each regulatory change made to the Stark Law regulations by the Final Rule, a discussion of each changes' practical implications for physicians and entities, and a review of remaining open questions.  In short, we hope the Critical Analysis will serve as resource for you now and into the future.

Sheppard Mullin's critical analysis of the Office of Inspector General's contemporaneously published final rule implementing the federal health care program Anti-Kickback Statute is forthcoming.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More