ARTICLE
3 November 2022

The Constitutional Court Decided To Annul The Provision Limiting The Maximum Application Period To 10 Years As Of The Finalization Of The Judgment For The Retrial

MA
Moroglu Arseven
Contributor
“Moroglu Arseven is a full-service law firm, with broadly demonstrated expertise and experience in all aspects of business law. Established in 2000, the firm combines a new generation of experienced international business lawyers, who hold academic, judicial and practical experience in all aspects of private law.”
The objection subject to the Constitutional Court's decision published in Official Gazette dated 1 July 2022 and numbered 31883 ...
Turkey Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The objection subject to the Constitutional Court's ("Constitutional Court") decision published in Official Gazette dated 1 July 2022 and numbered 31883, related to the request for annulment of the section "...in any case, ten years from the finalization of the judgment subject to the retrial request" in the article 377 paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law numbered 6100 ("CPL"), on the grounds that it is in violation of article 36 of the Constitution titled right to legal remedies.

While examining the request, the Constitutional Court took into account that one of the grounds for retrial against the finalized decision, stated in article 375 of the CPL was the decision to dismiss as a result of a violation, amicable settlement or a unilateral declaration as a result of an application to the European Court of Human Rights ("ECHR").

In this respect, the Constitutional Court has ruled that exceeding the 10-year period of prescription of rights due to reasons not caused by the relevant persons, such as the requirement for individual application to the Constitutional Court before the ECHR where applicable, and the increased workload of the ECHR, may render the retrial procedure nonfunctional.

Therefore, it has been decided to annul the relevant provision stipulating 10-year period of prescription, as it violates the right to an effective remedy, which is protected by article 40 of the Constitution.

You can access the full text of the Constitutional Court's decision numbered 2022/7 M. and 2022/79 D. published in Official Gazette dated 1 July 2022 and numbered 31883, via this link. (Only available in Turkish)

Information first published in the MA | Gazette, a fortnightly legal update newsletter produced by Moroglu Arseven.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
3 November 2022

The Constitutional Court Decided To Annul The Provision Limiting The Maximum Application Period To 10 Years As Of The Finalization Of The Judgment For The Retrial

Turkey Government, Public Sector
Contributor
“Moroglu Arseven is a full-service law firm, with broadly demonstrated expertise and experience in all aspects of business law. Established in 2000, the firm combines a new generation of experienced international business lawyers, who hold academic, judicial and practical experience in all aspects of private law.”
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More