ARTICLE
21 November 2017

Charging clauses: is near enough still good enough?

D
DibbsBarker
Contributor
This article considers a recent Victorian decision concerning a challenge to a charge clause in a commercial agreement.
Australia Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Services: Banking & Finance
Industry Focus: Financial Services

The October 2017 edition of the Australian Banking & Finance Law Bulletin (a LexisNexis publication) contains an article by Ben Shaw and Morgan Stack entitled 'Charging clauses: is near enough still good enough?'

The article considers a recent decision of the Victorian Supreme Court concerning a challenge to a charge clause in a commercial agreement, being the case of Re Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 1). The article also reviews the principles applicable to charging clauses.

This article is intended to provide commentary and general information. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this article. Authors listed may not be admitted in all states and territories

ARTICLE
21 November 2017

Charging clauses: is near enough still good enough?

Australia Finance and Banking
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More