Resolving GST ambiguity: A & A Property Developers Pty Ltd v MCCA Asset Management Ltd

D
DibbsBarker
Contributor
The article explores this approach to resolving ambiguity in the meaning of a GST provision in a sale of land contract.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Services: Dispute Resolution & Litigation, Real Estate & Construction
Industry Focus: Financial Services, Real Estate & Construction

The February 2018 edition of the Australian Property Law Bulletin (a LexisNexis publication) contains an article by Ben Shaw and Matthew Butchard entitled ' Resolving GST ambiguity: A & A Property Developers Pty Ltd v MCCA Asset Management Ltd.'

The proper approach to the construction of commercial contracts has been the subject of a number of recent decisions of the High Court. In this article, our authors explore the Victorian Court of Appeal's approach to resolving ambiguity in the meaning of a GST provision in a sale of land contract in A & A Property Developers Pty Ltd v MCCA Asset Management Ltd (A & A Property Developers).

This article is intended to provide commentary and general information. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this article. Authors listed may not be admitted in all states and territories

Resolving GST ambiguity: A & A Property Developers Pty Ltd v MCCA Asset Management Ltd

Australia Real Estate and Construction
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More