Skirts STILL (Dresses) Not Required

LD
Lincoln Derr PLLC
Contributor
Lincoln Derr is a North Carolina based women-owned and managed Civil Litigation Law Firm. Our attorneys represent some of the largest healthcare practices, municipalities, and Fortune 500 companies throughout the Southeast. We have expertise in a wide range of practice areas but focus on management-side Medical/Professional Liability, Labor & Employment, Complex Business, and Construction.
In June 2022, the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision struck down a North Carolina charter school's dress code requirement that female students wear skirts, skorts, or jumpers.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In June 2022, the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision struck down a North Carolina charter school's dress code requirement that female students wear skirts, skorts, or jumpers. This week, the Supreme Court let that decision stand.

In Peltier v. Charter Day School Inc.,  the Fourth Circuit determined that the charter school, which receives 95% of its funding from federal, state, and local governments, is a state actor and thereby subject to the Constitution. The panel concluded that the gender-specific dress code violated the Equal Protection Clause and may violate Title IV of the Education Amendments of 1972.

The school founder defended the skirt requirement as forwarding traditional values, chivalry, and respect. "Chivalry, the school founder said, is a code of conduct in which women are 'regarded as a fragile vessel that men are supposed to take care of and honor.'"

https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/charter-school-dress-code-requiring-skirts-for-girls
-violates-equal-protection-clause-4th-circuit-rules?utm_medium=email&utm_source=salesforce_
548683&sc_sid=03224626&utm_campaign=weekly_
email&promo=&utm_content=&additional4=&additional5=&sfmc_j=548683&sfmc_s=45960373&sfmc_
l=1527&sfmc_jb=31005&sfmc_mid=100027443&sfmc_u=15909175

Senior Judge Barbara Milano Keenan authored the majority opinion as well as a separate opinion, joined by another judge, addressing the school's argument that because the girls at the school "succeed," the skirt requirement is harmless and has no effect on the students. Judge Keenan wrote, "It is irrelevant how well these students performed despite careering the burden of unequal treatment. We cannot excuse discrimination because its victims are resilient enough to persist in the face of such unequal treatment." https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/201001A.P.pdf

After a loss at the Fourth Circuit, the charter school appealed to the Surpreme Court but the Court announced this week that it declined to hear the appeal. The lower court's decision and now the Supreme Court's allowance of the decision to stand is a significant development of the law as it recognized the harms of gender stereotypes; its impact will likely go beyond antiquated school dress codes. It is insulting to assume that females must wear skirts in order to receive the courtesy and respect that all individuals deserve. The decision to wear a skirt or pants is a personal choice and one that should not be dictated. Young girls should be taught that their agency and strength is not tied to a skirt, dress, or pants, rather it comes from within. Remember, it was never a dress.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Skirts STILL (Dresses) Not Required

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
Lincoln Derr is a North Carolina based women-owned and managed Civil Litigation Law Firm. Our attorneys represent some of the largest healthcare practices, municipalities, and Fortune 500 companies throughout the Southeast. We have expertise in a wide range of practice areas but focus on management-side Medical/Professional Liability, Labor & Employment, Complex Business, and Construction.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More