Levi Strauss Settles Trademark Dispute Over Pocket Tab On Jeans

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
Levi Strauss continues enforcement of its Tab trademark against other fashion companies.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Levi Strauss continues enforcement of its Tab trademark against other fashion companies. On May 7, 2024, just a couple months after filing suit against Brunello Cucinelli, Levi Strauss voluntarily dismissed its lawsuit. Levi's filed suit against the Italian luxury fashion brand in the Northern District of California in January 2024 alleging infringement of Levi's rectangular pocket tab trademark. Levi's dismissed the suit after reaching a confidential settlement.

The Levi's Tab trademark has been registered for over 80 years, with use alleged as early as 1936, and the distinction of being registered since 1938. Levi's has used the Tab trademark in a variety of colors, and often displays the Tab in red. In its Complaint, Levi's alleged Brunello Cucinelli manufactured, promoted, and sold clothing bearing tabs that are “nearly identical” to Levi's Tab trademark.

Levi's has brought and settled several trademark infringement lawsuits in recent years seeking to protect the Tab trademark. A lesson for all brand owners on both the sword and defense benefits of formal registration and regular enforcement of rights.

1466156a.jpg

(Images from Complaint, Levi Strauss & Co. v. Brunello Cucinelli USA Inc. et al., case number 3:24-cv-00399, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.)

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More