ARTICLE
1 August 2022

Monthly TCPA Digest — July 2022

M
Mintz
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this issue's Regulatory Update, we cover a first-of-its-kind FCC Enforcement Bureau Order directing all U.S.-based voice service providers to take immediate steps to mitigate suspected illegal robocall traffic from a group of robocallers. The Order calls for the providers to block traffic or terminate their business relationship with the robocallers — and to block all traffic from a number of originating providers that failed to respond to a previous FCC warning calling for them to stop carrying the robocallers' traffic. Additionally, we report on legislation introduced in Congress to expand the scope of the TCPA. The Robotext Scam Prevention Act would amend the TCPA to cover text messages and expand the statutory definition of an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS) to include a wider variety of devices used to automatically dial or text phone numbers. It would also provide a safe harbor enabling providers to use an ATDS to call or text a consenting person at a new number, as long as the caller uses the Commission's Reassigned Number Database.

In our Litigation Update, we discuss how the Robotext Scam Prevention Act could undo judicial decisions that significantly limited the application of the TCPA to live calls and text messages. In its 2021 decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, the Supreme Court held that an ATDS must have the ability to store or produce a telephone number using a random or sequential number generator. The Eighth Circuit and Ninth Circuit, along with many district courts, have since rejected ATDS claims. Passage of the bill would result in major changes for both businesses and consumers.

In This Edition

Part I – TCPA Regulatory Update

Part II – TCPA Litigation Update

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
1 August 2022

Monthly TCPA Digest — July 2022

United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More