The Delaware Chancery Court rejected an attempt to hold directors of Meta liable for the implications their social media products have to the economy as a whole. The plaintiff argued that the social media company's directors hurt Meta shareholders that invested in Meta as part of a portfolio of investments designed to cover the economy broadly (though vehicles such as index funds).
The Chancery Court concluded that a director's fiduciary duties are to shareholders to maximize that company's value for its shareholder, not to maximize the economy as a whole.
While Delaware law requires corporate directors to act in the best interests of their stockholders, including maximizing the value of their shares, attorneys for McRitchie argued that Delaware courts should recognize a "portfolio theory" of corporate governance that takes into account external factors.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.