Boston Patent Law Association Response To Request For Comments On Administrative Updates To The General Requirements Bulletin For Admission To The Examination For Registration To Practice In Patent Cases Before The United States Patent And Trademark Office

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Contributor
For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
Jonathan Roses co-authored on behalf of the Boston Patent Law Association's (BPLA's) Patent Office Practice Committee a May 2021 Response to USPTO Request for Comments on proposed updates...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Jonathan Roses co-authored on behalf of the Boston Patent Law Association's (BPLA's) Patent Office Practice Committee a May 2021 Response to USPTO Request for Comments on proposed updates to the USPTO's General Requirements Bulletin, which sets forth requirements for admission to the exam required to practice in patent cases before the USPTO (also known as the Patent Bar Exam). The Response expressed support for the USPTO's proposal to expand the list of "Category A" bachelor's degrees, which presumptively qualify an applicant to sit for the Patent Bar Exam, and proposed additional degrees for consideration for inclusion in Category A. The BPLA also advocated for a flexible approach in determining whether a specific degree falls within Category A, even if not listed therein verbatim, explaining that an overly rigid approach could discourage applicants, in particular those presently underrepresented in the innovation ecosystem. Finally, the Response agreed with the proposal to accept advanced degrees under Category A, while advocating for a common sense review to determine whether such degrees match those listed, and agreed with proposed clarifying changes to other options for admission.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Boston Patent Law Association Response To Request For Comments On Administrative Updates To The General Requirements Bulletin For Admission To The Examination For Registration To Practice In Patent Cases Before The United States Patent And Trademark Office

United States Intellectual Property
Contributor
For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More