ARTICLE
27 April 2022

Monthly TCPA Digest — April 2022

M
Mintz
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this issue's Regulatory Update, ...
United States Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this issue's Regulatory Update, we discuss the expansion of the FCC's robocalling investigation partnerships to include five additional states — Alaska, California, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and Washington — and how these and other FCC-state collaborations are expected to help combat robocalls. In addition, we cover the FCC Enforcement Bureau's latest cease-and-desist letters to companies facilitating unlawful robocalling traffic on their networks, outline clarifications from the Commission regarding the use of the Reassigned Numbers Database (RND), and review Acting FCC Chairwoman Rosenworcel's response to a letter from Representative Vern Buchanan seeking information about the Commission's efforts to combat scam calls and protect vulnerable consumers.

In our Litigation Update, you'll find a discussion of the Eighth Circuit's recent Beal v. Outfield Brew House ruling, one of the first appellate decisions to interpret the Supreme Court's reasoning in its 2021 Facebook v. Duguid case. In Facebook, the Court narrowed the definition of "autodialer" (ATDS), ruling that under TCPA, the term refers only to a device that uses a random or sequential number generator when storing or dialing telephone numbers. By holding that a product that randomly selects numbers from a stored list is not an ATDS if it does not generate random or sequential phone numbers to begin with, the Eighth Circuit rejected plaintiffs' misreading of Facebook. Its decision should help bolster defendants' arguments nationwide.

If you have suggestions for topics you'd like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz's TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

In This Edition

Part I – TCPA Regulatory Update

Part II – TCPA Litigation Update

Eighth Circuit Finds System That Sends Texts to Stored Numbers Is Not an ATDS

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
27 April 2022

Monthly TCPA Digest — April 2022

United States Consumer Protection
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More