ARTICLE
25 April 2024

Chancery Excuses Condition In Stockholder Agreement When Company Caused Its Non-Occurrence

MJ
Morris James LLP
Contributor
Morris James is a leading provider of sophisticated legal services with 70 lawyers located in six offices throughout Delaware. We are a full service firm helping Delaware corporations, businesses and private clients address complex legal concerns. Our clients-first philosophy, multi-disciplinary approach and collective experience earn us high regard from clients, peers and the business community
In this case, as part of a sale of a majority interest, a stockholder agreement granted the founders the ability to designate members to the board of directors so long as at least one founder ...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Chordia v. Lee, C.A. No. 2023-0382-NAC (Del. Ch. Jan. 4, 2024)
In this case, as part of a sale of a majority interest, a stockholder agreement granted the founders the ability to designate members to the board of directors so long as at least one founder remained at the company as an officer or employee. The agreement also granted the board the ability to hire and fire executive employees, but did not allow the board to terminate non-executive employees. In addition, the stockholder's agreement required that the company use reasonable efforts to ensure the rights in the agreement remained effective for the founders' benefit.

Following the sale, the board attempted to remove the remaining founders from the company in order to undermine the founders' designation rights. Some of the founders were non-executive employees that the board was unable to remove, however. Therefore, the board appointed a new CEO to terminate these employees. In response, the plaintiffs filed suit under 8 Del. C. § 225. In its post-trial opinion, the Court held that the CEO acted for the company in carrying out the terminations and, therefore, was bound by the reasonable efforts provision. Therefore, because the company caused the non-occurrence of the requirement under the agreement, the founders retained their entitlement to appoint members to the board.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
25 April 2024

Chancery Excuses Condition In Stockholder Agreement When Company Caused Its Non-Occurrence

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Morris James is a leading provider of sophisticated legal services with 70 lawyers located in six offices throughout Delaware. We are a full service firm helping Delaware corporations, businesses and private clients address complex legal concerns. Our clients-first philosophy, multi-disciplinary approach and collective experience earn us high regard from clients, peers and the business community
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More