Delaware Court Of Chancery Rejects Validity Of "New Wave" Stockholder Agreement Terms That Constrain Traditional Board Authority

ML
Milbank LLP
Contributor
Milbank LLP is a leading international law firm that provides innovative legal services from 12 offices around the world. Founded in New York over 150 years ago, Milbank helps the world’s leading commercial, financial and industrial enterprises, as well as institutions, individuals and governments, achieve their strategic objectives.
Founders and controlling stockholders often seek to retain control over their companies even after taking them public, typically via high-vote share classes...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Founders and controlling stockholders often seek to retain control over their companies even after taking them public, typically via high-vote share classes or, as was at issue in this case, via stockholder agreements granting the pre-IPO owners broad governance rights.

In West Palm Beach Firefighters' Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held that a "new wave" stockholder agreement between Moelis & Company (the "Company") and its founder, CEO, and board chairman, Ken Moelis was invalid under Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL") because it contained "pre-approval rights" over a number of corporate actions, required the board to recommend individuals designated by Moelis for a majority of directorships and fill committee positions and board vacancies with Moelis designees, impermissibly constraining the board's ability to manage the business and affairs of the company—powers the statute does not allow the board to delegate via contract.

Moelis is a strong reminder that the foundation of the corporate form in Delaware is the independent authority of a board of directors, elected by stockholders and entrusted to manage the business and affairs of the corporation as fiduciaries. Delaware will not permit this foundation to be eroded through contractual arrangements with stockholders.

Click here to read the full insight: "Delaware Court of Chancery Rejects Validity of "New Wave" Stockholder Agreement Terms that Constrain Traditional Board Authority"

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Delaware Court Of Chancery Rejects Validity Of "New Wave" Stockholder Agreement Terms That Constrain Traditional Board Authority

United States Corporate/Commercial Law
Contributor
Milbank LLP is a leading international law firm that provides innovative legal services from 12 offices around the world. Founded in New York over 150 years ago, Milbank helps the world’s leading commercial, financial and industrial enterprises, as well as institutions, individuals and governments, achieve their strategic objectives.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More