ARTICLE
16 January 2024

Sanctions Clauses In Documentary Credit Transactions: A Cautionary Tale

In Kuvera Resources Pte Ltd v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2023] SGCA 28, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a confirming bank was not entitled to deny payment to the beneficiary...
Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Kuvera Resources Pte Ltd v JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. [2023] SGCA 28, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that a confirming bank was not entitled to deny payment to the beneficiary of two letters of credit (LCs) on the ground that its confirmations of the LCs included a contractual clause (Sanctions Clause) which extinguished the confirming bank's liability as the underlying commercial transaction was allegedly caught by the sanctions laws of the United States of America.

This update takes a look at the Court of Appeal's decision, which overturned the decision of the General Division of the High Court of Singapore permitting the bank to deny payment by reason of the Sanctions Clause.

Please click here to view the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
16 January 2024

Sanctions Clauses In Documentary Credit Transactions: A Cautionary Tale

Singapore Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More