CURATED
9 December 2021

Part-time And Fixed-Term Employment In Denmark

PS
Poul Schmith
Contributor
Poul Schmith logo
Poul Schmith is a full-service law firm. We offer highly specialised legal advice in all areas of relevance to our clients. Conducting over 1,500 lawsuits each year, our litigation experience is unrivalled. Although our history goes back a long way, about 700 employees are fully prepared to meet the requirements and needs of the future. Together, they create a unique culture rooted in society’s special expectations for us. We are always curious to learn more about our individual clients’ businesses and to find the way that best supports their specific venture, through our legal expertise and development of Legal Tech solutions. This is how we, as attorneys, are best able to help future-proof our clients’ businesses.
This article provides a brief overview of the rules relating to part-time and fixed-term employment in Denmark.
Denmark Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This article provides a brief overview of the rules relating to part-time and fixed-term employment in Denmark.

1. The Act on Fixed-Term Employment

  • Definition: according to the Danish Act on Fixed-Term Employment, “fixed-term employment” is employment where the expiry of the employment is determined by objective criteria, such as a specific date, completing a specific task or the occurrence of a specific event.
  • The principle of non-discrimination: the Act stipulates that fixed-term employees may not be treated less favourably than comparable permanently employed employees solely because they are fixed-term employees unless the different treatment is justified by objective reasons. A “comparable permanently employed employee” is a permanently employed employee engaged in the same or similar work with due consideration to qualifications and skills.
  • Participation in benefits: one of the consequences of the Act is that participation in benefits es-tablished by the employer (pension schemes, incentive programmes, etc.) may not be subject to the condition of the employee being permanently employed. However, it is not contrary to the Act if the employer demands that an employee must have certain seniority to be entitled to such benefit.
  • Renewal of fixed-term employment: according to the Act, renewal of fixed-term employment must be justified by objective reasons. Objective reasons are for example unforeseeable absence such as sickness, pregnancy and birth.
  • The consequences of non-compliance: an employee whose rights under the law has been in-fringed or who has been dismissed for having raised a claim under the Act may be awarded compensation. Further, if a fixed-term employee has been treated less favourably than a compa-rable permanently employed employee, for example a lower salary, the employer must pay the difference.

2. The Act on Part-Time Employment

  • Definition: a “part-time” employee is an employee whose normal working hours are less than the normal working hours of a comparable full-time employee (usually 37 hours per week). A “comparable full-time employee” is a full-time employee engaged in the same or similar work.
  • The principle of non-discrimination: the Act stipulates that part-time employees may not be treated less favourably than comparable full-time employees solely because they are part-time employees unless the differential treatment is justified by objective reasons. The principle en-tails among other things that part-time employees are entitled to participate in the employer's benefits (pension schemes, incentive programmes etc.) on the same terms as comparable full-time employees unless the differential treatment is based on objective reasons.
  • Agreements on part-time employment: according to the Act, an employer and an employee are free to agree that the employee should work part-time notwithstanding the restrictions on such agreements in for example collective agreements.
  • The consequences of non-compliance: in cases where an employee is dismissed because the em-ployee rejects working part-time or because the employer rejects the employee's request for working part-time, the employee is entitled to compensation. If a part-time employee has been treated less favour-ably than a full-time employee, for example by being paid a (relatively) lower salary, the part-time employee is entitled to the difference.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

CURATED
9 December 2021

Part-time And Fixed-Term Employment In Denmark

Denmark Employment and HR
Contributor
Poul Schmith logo
Poul Schmith is a full-service law firm. We offer highly specialised legal advice in all areas of relevance to our clients. Conducting over 1,500 lawsuits each year, our litigation experience is unrivalled. Although our history goes back a long way, about 700 employees are fully prepared to meet the requirements and needs of the future. Together, they create a unique culture rooted in society’s special expectations for us. We are always curious to learn more about our individual clients’ businesses and to find the way that best supports their specific venture, through our legal expertise and development of Legal Tech solutions. This is how we, as attorneys, are best able to help future-proof our clients’ businesses.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More