Why the Lacrosse appeal raises new questions about professional indemnity risks

The fire damaged apartments and the local authority ordered the removal and replacement of the cladding on the building.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Following our summary of the Lacrosse appeal decision last week, our PI and Construction teams have examined the key issues addressed by the Court, including liability apportionment, Building Code of Australia requirements and the use of the peer professional opinion defence.

In this article, W+K partners Nick Lux and Andrew Brennan provide in-depth analysis of these issues and look at the questions they raise for construction professionals and their insurers.

To read the full article, click on the download below.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Why the Lacrosse appeal raises new questions about professional indemnity risks

Australia Real Estate and Construction
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More