ARTICLE
17 February 2023

Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Untimely SOX Whistleblower Claims

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
On January 4, the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a former bank executive's whistleblower retaliation claims, holding that two procedural errors doomed his case: he sued before exhausting his administrative remedies...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 4, the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a former bank executive's whistleblower retaliation claims, holding that two procedural errors doomed his case: he sued before exhausting his administrative remedies; and then he belatedly filed an administrative complaint after the statute of limitations had run. Jaludi v. Citigroup, No. 21-cv-1108.

Background

Plaintiff alleged that he was demoted, transferred and ultimately discharged after he reported alleged wrongdoing. He also alleged that he was then "blacklisted" from the financial industry.

In 2015, Plaintiff filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania alleging various claims, including unlawful retaliation under SOX's anti-retaliation provision. The district court initially granted the bank's motion to compel arbitration, but in 2019, the Third Circuit reversed, holding that the Dodd-Frank Act amended SOX to prohibit pre-dispute agreements requiring arbitration of SOX whistleblower claims. On remand, the district court dismissed the SOX claim as untimely because Plaintiff waited more than two years after the last incident of alleged retaliation to file an administrative complaint with OSHA—long after the 180-day deadline.

Ruling

On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed. The court first held—after analyzing the statute's plain language and applying basic rules of statutory construction—that SOX's statute of limitations and exhaustion requirements are not jurisdictional. The court therefore determined that it could proceed to the merits. The court then concluded that Plaintiff's SOX claims were time-barred because he failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit in court, and only filed his administrative complaint after the 180-day statute of limitations had expired. The court also rejected Plaintiff's request for leave to amend, ruling that any amendment would be futile.

Implications

This decision serves as a reminder that courts will strictly construe the 180-day statute of limitations applicable to SOX whistleblower claims.

Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Untimely SOX Whistleblower Claims

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
17 February 2023

Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Untimely SOX Whistleblower Claims

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More