Thomashower Comments On SCOTUS Jack Daniel's Decision And NYIPLA Amicus Brief

PC
Pryor Cashman LLP

Contributor

A premier, midsized law firm headquartered in New York City, Pryor Cashman boasts nearly 180 attorneys and offices in both Los Angeles and Miami. From every office, we are known for getting the job done right, and doing it with integrity, efficiency and élan.
Pryor Cashman Counsel William Thomashower, a member of the Intellectual Property Group, serves on the New York Intellectual Property Law Association's Amicus Brief Committee...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Pryor Cashman Counsel William Thomashower, a member of the Intellectual Property Group, serves on the New York Intellectual Property Law Association's Amicus Brief Committee, which filed an amicus curiae brief in January 2023 to the U.S. Supreme Court in an important trademark case, Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC.

On June 8, 2023, the Court decided the case (read Pryor Cashman's Client Alert and the opinion here), and NYIPLA posted comments on LinkedIn on June 13. The case focused on a trademark infringement and trademark dilution claim by Jack Daniel's against VIP Products, which had created a parody dog chew toy product called "Bad Spaniels" that used wording and trade dress similar to the Jack Daniel's Black Label whiskey bottle. Jack Daniel's challenged this as likely causing confusion and, although an attempt at humor, tarnishing its brand. Reversing a dismissal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which had found the parody "humorous expression," the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Jack Daniel's by remanding the case for a determination under the likelihood of confusion standard.

In the NYIPLA brief, Bill and his co-authors argued (in favor of neither party) that the Supreme Court needed to clarify the standards for trademark infringement when a parody product had both commercial and expressive components. The Court's decision addressed that issue.

In the NYIPLA LinkedIn post following the SCOTUS decision, Bill provided a summary of the decision and noted that the Court addressed the point raised in the amicus brief.

Read the full NYIPLA amicus brief and the Supreme Court decision using the links below.

Resources

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Thomashower Comments On SCOTUS Jack Daniel's Decision And NYIPLA Amicus Brief

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

A premier, midsized law firm headquartered in New York City, Pryor Cashman boasts nearly 180 attorneys and offices in both Los Angeles and Miami. From every office, we are known for getting the job done right, and doing it with integrity, efficiency and élan.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More