Rules For Complainant Success In ITC Trade Secret Litigation

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Define the technical metes and bounds of the trade secret information – delimiting the border between the secret and what is known in the public domain...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Successful ITC trade secret complainants follow these rules before filing the complaint in Section 337 investigations:

  • Identify and prepare "packages" for each of the trade secrets you plan to assert before you file the Complaint.  Each trade secret package should:
    • Define the technical metes and bounds of the trade secret information – delimiting the border between the secret and what is known in the public domain
    • Calculate the value of the trade secret (to the complainant and competitors)
    • Demonstrate that reasonable measures were taken to protect the trade secret information (confidentiality agreements, etc.)
    • Demonstrate that the trade secret belongs to the Complainant (development documentation, etc.)
    • Show the time and expense incurred in developing the trade secret.
  • Prepare a detailed fact discovery game plan before the case is filed.  The ITC is too fast for major course corrections.
  • Prepare the domestic industry and injury proofs.  Under no circumstances leave the development of these proofs until the case is under way.
    • The ITC is looking for detailed, supported contextual information to allow an assessment of the relative "significance" of the domestic industry  activities and expenditures.  The facts and circumstances will vary for each case – it is important to get the story straight early and make sure supportive, specific information is produced in fact discovery.     
    • The substantial injury story similarly requires substantiation and extrinsic evidence.   This proof has many nuances and cannot be left to the last minute either.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Rules For Complainant Success In ITC Trade Secret Litigation

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More