World Trade Centre Default Judgment - But enforcement may be difficult

The US Federal Judge filed a controversial default judgment for terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 15 December 2011 Federal Judge George Daniels entered default judgment against Iran, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Hezbollah finding each liable for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York. The $100 billion law suit brought by family members of the victims of the attacks is now to be considered by a Magistrate Judge who will decide remaining issues, including the assessment of compensatory and punitive damages.

The judgment is a controversial one in that it attributes liability for the attack to Iran. An Iranian Government memorandum was lead as evidence of Iran's involvement. It purportedly showed that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei had prior knowledge of the attacks. The Iranian Government has repeatedly denied any connection with the World Trade Centre attacks.

Will insurers who have paid out hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation consider recovery claims against any or all of the named defendants? Collecting the money may be a problem.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

World Trade Centre Default Judgment - But enforcement may be difficult

United States Government, Public Sector

Contributor

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More