Tax Court Addresses Related Party Rules As Applied For S Corporation Employees Participating In An ESOP

In Petersen v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. No. 22 (June 13, 2017), the Tax Court addressed the application of Section 267(a)(2) to an S corporation that maintains an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Petersen v. Commissioner, 148 T.C. No. 22 (June 13, 2017), the Tax Court addressed the application of Section 267(a)(2) to an S corporation that maintains an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).

Section 267(a)(2) defers deductions for expenses paid by a taxpayer to a related person until the payments are includible in the related person's gross income. The court held that employees who participate in an S corporation's ESOP are related persons for this purpose. As a result, the S corporation cannot take a deduction for compensation items, such as bonus payments until the tax year in which the employee includes the compensation in income, even if the S corporation is on an accrual basis of accounting and could otherwise take the deduction in an earlier tax year, the court ruled.

It is important to note that for employees who do not participate in the ESOP, an S corporation should take deductions in accordance with its method of accounting without regard to Section 267(a)(2).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More