ARTICLE
23 November 2017

FINRA Requests Information On Order Routing Conflicts

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
In November, FINRA will distribute to select firms a targeted exam letter on order routing conflicts.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In November, FINRA will distribute to select firms a targeted exam letter on order routing conflicts. The targeted exams are used to gather information, conduct investigations, and inform responses to particular regulatory issues.

The Trading & Financial Compliance Examinations ("TFCE") section of FINRA's Market Regulation Department is conducting a review of the impact of inducements on order routing practices. Order routing inducements include payment for order flow and maker-taker rebates. Specifically, TFCE is soliciting information regarding the following:

  1. how a firm quantifies benefits to customers from the firm's receipt of order routing inducements;
  2. how a firm fulfills its duty of best execution and how a firm quantifies the benefits to customers of particular types of routing orders (e.g. routing orders that may have differing transaction costs in different market centers); and
  3. how a firm manages conflicts of interest between the duty of best execution to customers and the firm's own financial interests that arise in connection with order routing inducements.

Commentary / Patrick A. Calves

The FINRA targeted exam letter asks very broad and generic questions concerning very complex issues. This puts firms in a difficult position when trying to accurately and fully respond. It also leaves significant room for interpretation of the questions and thus variance in responses.

Nonetheless, order inducements such as maker-taker pricing and payment for order flow, while a frequent hot topic, are clearly under increased regulatory scrutiny. Note that FINRA's targeted exam letter conspicuously coincides with the SEC's focus on launching an access fee pilot. Firms should review prior FINRA and SEC guidance (see FINRA Regulatory Notice 15-46) on best execution obligations and payment for order flow when responding to this letter and when making order routing decisions (or programming order routing algorithms) generally.

Commentary /Steven Lofchie

This is a very clear message to firms that they must review their order routing and best-execution procedures.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
23 November 2017

FINRA Requests Information On Order Routing Conflicts

United States Corporate/Commercial Law

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More