ARTICLE
8 October 2019

Temp Agency Absolved Of Liability In Hotly Contested Action

WS
Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Contributor

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman offers world-class representation for clients ranging from individuals to Fortune 500 corporations, with an emphasis on small to middle market firms. We offer services across a comprehensive range of practice areas. By combining decades of experience and in-depth legal knowledge with innovative management and the use of technology, we anticipate problems, seize opportunities and get cases resolved.
Nationally acclaimed trial lawyer, WSHB Partner Andrew Kessler, secured summary judgment in a matter pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Nationally acclaimed trial lawyer, WSHB Partner Andrew Kessler, secured summary judgment in a matter pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, in favor of our clients, a temporary staffing agency and one of the temporary employees that it placed with a third party company. Plaintiff, a 64 year-old married woman, slipped and fell entering a bathroom which had been recently mopped but for which no wet floor sign had been placed by the temporary employee. As a result of this slip and fall, Plaintiff sustained a fractured hip and significant injuries to her right shoulder and lower back. Plaintiff who was working at the third party company at the time of the incident had a workers' compensation lien in excess of $350,000 and was claiming permanent injuries which had significantly affected her activities of daily living.

Plaintiff alleged that the temp agency was negligent in placing the temporary employee into a position for which he was not qualified and that the temporary employee was negligent for failing to ensure that a wet floor sign had been placed near the entrance to the bathroom. Mr. Kessler secured summary judgment by asserting that (1) the application of the Borrowed Servant Doctrine compelled a finding that the third party company should be considered the temporary employee's "employer"—not the temp agency. Since the third party company exclusively directed and controlled the conduct of the temporary employee—both with regard to the tasks to be done and the manner of performing them, the temp agency could not be held liable as a matter of law when it did not retain any right of control over the same; and (2) the temporary employee himself was immune from individual liability through the exclusivity provisions of the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act which provides that a co-employee is immune from liability for any work-related injury of a fellow employee.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
8 October 2019

Temp Agency Absolved Of Liability In Hotly Contested Action

United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Contributor

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman offers world-class representation for clients ranging from individuals to Fortune 500 corporations, with an emphasis on small to middle market firms. We offer services across a comprehensive range of practice areas. By combining decades of experience and in-depth legal knowledge with innovative management and the use of technology, we anticipate problems, seize opportunities and get cases resolved.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More