ARTICLE
21 April 2020

ITC Considers An Exclusion Order In An Investigation Based On Purported Standard-Essential Patents

AG
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Contributor

Akin is a law firm focused on providing extraordinary client service, a rewarding environment for our diverse workforce and exceptional legal representation irrespective of ability to pay. The deep transactional, litigation, regulatory and policy experience we bring to client engagements helps us craft innovative, effective solutions and strategies.
On April 7, 2020, the International Trade Commission (ITC) overturned certain findings in the Final ID and reversed the Final ID's finding of a violation of Section 337 by several SK hynix entities (the "Respondents")...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On April 7, 2020, the International Trade Commission (ITC) overturned certain findings in the Final ID and reversed the Final ID's finding of a violation of Section 337 by several SK hynix entities (the "Respondents") with respect to one of two patents asserted by the Complainant, Netlist, Inc. The ITC determined: (1) the Respondents' accused products did not infringe either of the asserted patents, (2) Netlist failed to provide sufficient evidence that its products satisfied the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement, and (3) the asserted patents were not essential to the JEDEC technical standard. To read the full alert, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More