ARTICLE
18 August 2015

Generic Competitor's Regulatory Issues Prompt Stay Of Lialda® Patent Litigation

HP
Haug Partners

Contributor

Haug Partners is a full-service law firm that provides integrated multidisciplinary legal services for technology companies. Through relationships with firms in Germany, China, Japan, and other key international markets, Haug Partners has the resources, technical expertise, legal acumen, and business judgment to consistently deliver optimal outcomes for clients.
As set forth in the decision, Mylan's failure to respond to a deficiency letter received from FDA in May 2014 "raise[d] serious questions in the Court's mind as to the viability of Mylan's ANDA product as currently formulated."
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a first-of-its-kind public decision, Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP obtained a stay and administrative closure of a Hatch-Waxman patent case on behalf of its client Shire Pharmaceuticals, because of the generic drug maker Mylan Pharmaceuticals' problems with their application in the FDA. Judge Charlene Honeywell, of the U.S. Middle District of Florida stated that the uncertainty surrounding the status of Mylan's proposed generic product warranted her action.

As set forth in the decision, Mylan's failure to respond to a deficiency letter received from FDA in May 2014 "raise[d] serious questions in the Court's mind as to the viability of Mylan's ANDA product as currently formulated." And Mylan's June 2015 request for a year-long extension to respond to FDA – made three months prior to trial – "further reinforce[d] that there is a significant possibility that Mylan's product will have to be reformulated and/or its ANDA materially amended."

Under the terms of the August 11, 2015 Order, the case will remain administratively closed, with all case deadlines tolled and stayed, until May 31, 2016 or until Mylan provides its ANDA resubmission, whichever occurs first. Notwithstanding the administrative closure, the Order further requires Mylan to timely produce all correspondence with FDA regarding its ANDA to Shire in the meantime.

Attorneys from Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP involved in the case on behalf of Shire Pharmaceuticals include: Ed Haug, Jason Lief, Andrew Wasson and Elizabeth Murphy.

The case name and number are Shire Development LLC, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., No. 8:12-cv-01190-CEH-AEP (M.D. Fla.).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
18 August 2015

Generic Competitor's Regulatory Issues Prompt Stay Of Lialda® Patent Litigation

United States Intellectual Property

Contributor

Haug Partners is a full-service law firm that provides integrated multidisciplinary legal services for technology companies. Through relationships with firms in Germany, China, Japan, and other key international markets, Haug Partners has the resources, technical expertise, legal acumen, and business judgment to consistently deliver optimal outcomes for clients.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More