ARTICLE
31 August 2021

Lamonica v. Hartford

MC
Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass

Contributor

Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass
This case concerned a claim for damage to a residential property as a result of Hurricane Michael in October 2018.
United States Insurance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Lamonica v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, No. 5:19CV78-RH-MJF, 2019 WL 8063350, (N.D. Fla. Nov. 27, 2019)

This case concerned a claim for damage to a residential property as a result of Hurricane Michael in October 2018. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest successfully defeated a motion for partial summary judgment in which the insured argued, in part, that the insurer waived its coverage position by tendering payment post suit. Acknowledging that Hartford had explicitly reserved all of its defenses in tendering payment, the district court relied on longstanding Florida law to find that "coverage cannot be extended by estoppel, at least in the absence of detrimental reliance on the insurer's acknowledgment of coverage." The court consequently denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and its companion motion to tax fees and costs.

DOWNLOAD

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
31 August 2021

Lamonica v. Hartford

United States Insurance

Contributor

Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More