ARTICLE
26 August 2021

Aghadiunio v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association

MC
Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass

Contributor

Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass
Aghadiunio v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n, Index No. 80004/2019 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 3, 2020)...
United States Insurance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Aghadiunio v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n, Index No. 80004/2019 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 3, 2020)

The plaintiff originally sued New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association pro se  and filed an amended complaint pro se. Thereafter, an attorney appeared on her behalf and filed a second amended complaint asserting causes of action relating to coverage (residential water damage) as well as negligence and fraud. The complaint also included demands for punitive damages and attorneys' fees. The court granted NYPIUA's motion to dismiss, holding that “[t]he facts underlying plaintiff''s negligence claim stem entirely from defendant's contractual obligations under the insurance policy” and that “[p]laintiff's fraud claim is also duplicative of her breach of contract claim.”

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
26 August 2021

Aghadiunio v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association

United States Insurance

Contributor

Mound Cotton Wollan & Greengrass
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More