ARTICLE
2 December 2022

Supreme Court Of Georgia Reinstates 6-Week Abortion Law

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Nov. 23, the Supreme Court of Georgia reinstated the state's ban on abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Nov. 23, the Supreme Court of Georgia reinstated the state's ban on abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat. The Supreme Court of Georgia issued a one-page order granting the State of Georgia's Emergency Petition for Supersedeas following the Superior Court of Fulton County's ruling that Sections 4 and 11 of the Georgia LIFE Act are void ab initio.

The Supreme Court of Georgia order can be read here. More information on the Superior Court of Fulton County's ruling can be found on the BakerHostetler Post-Roe Resource Center. BakerHostetler will continue to monitor this and other similar developments.

Georgia 6-Week Abortion Law Is Void Ab Initio

Key Takeaways

  • On Nov. 15, The Superior Court of Fulton County declared sections of Georgia's 6-week abortion ban void and unenforceable.
  • The Court held that because the ban was unconstitutional at the time it was passed in 2019, it was never valid law.
  • The state has reportedly filed a notice of appeal.

Overview

On Nov. 15, the Superior Court of Fulton County issued an order finding that two sections of the Georgia LIFE Act (the Act) – Sections 4 and 11 – were void ab initio. Section 4 of the Act criminalized abortions after the detection of a heartbeat (typically around six weeks into the pregnancy), with exceptions only for certain medical emergencies and in cases of rape or incest where a police report was filed. Section 11 required any physician who performed an abortion after detecting a fetal heartbeat to report to the Georgia Department of Public Health the exception under Section 4 of the Act that applied to justify the otherwise illegal procedure. Spokespersons for the state reported that the state has filed a notice of appeal.

Procedural History

The Act was signed in 2019 and took partial effect on Jan. 1, 2020. The Act was challenged, and parts were found unconstitutional by the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court's order, allowing the Act to take effect.

Superior Court Ruling

The court explained that Georgia's void ab initio doctrine provides that "[l]egislative acts in violation of this Constitution or the Constitution of the United States are void, and the judiciary shall so declare them." Further, "[t]he time with reference to which the constitutionality of an act of the general assembly is to be determined is the date of its passage, and, if it is unconstitutional, then it is forever void." Therefore, since at the time of the passage of the Act, it was unequivocally unconstitutional for governments – federal, state or local – to ban abortions before viability, Section 4 of the Act was void ab initio. Since Section 11 cannot survive independent of Section 4, it too is void ab initio.

The full order can be read here. BakerHostetler will continue to monitor this and other similar developments

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More