ARTICLE
17 January 2022

Supreme Court Prevents OSHA "Vaccine Or Test" Standard From Taking Immediate Effect But Allows Healthcare Worker Mandate To Stand

WS
Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Contributor

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman offers world-class representation for clients ranging from individuals to Fortune 500 corporations, with an emphasis on small to middle market firms. We offer services across a comprehensive range of practice areas. By combining decades of experience and in-depth legal knowledge with innovative management and the use of technology, we anticipate problems, seize opportunities and get cases resolved.
On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court granted the applications from parties who challenged the ETS from OSHA that required employers with one hundred or more employees to, among other things, ...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court granted the applications from parties who challenged the Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) that required employers with one hundred or more employees to, among other things, compel employees to either obtain the COVID-19 vaccine or test weekly for presence of the virus and wear a mask in the workplace.

The Supreme Court did not rule on the actual merits of the ETS but instead granted an injunction that prevents the ETS from taking immediate effect while litigation on the merits of the ETS proceeds in the lower courts. In so doing, a majority of the Court (six judges) found that the ETS was, on its face, a general public health measure as opposed to an "occupational safety or health standard." The statutes speaking to OSHA's statutory power only regulate it to address the latter. OSHA's attempt to regulate COVID-19 – which is present everywhere – would improperly expand its power to regulate the "hazards of daily life." The Court would ultimately state that, "[a]lthough Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly."

At the same time, a majority of the Court (five judges) allowed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to enforce its "vaccine mandate" nationwide while litigation on the merits of that "mandate" continues. Around the same time that OSHA's ETS went into effect, the Secretary of Health and Human Services announced that facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding must ensure that their staff is vaccinated from COVID-19. The Supreme Court today found that those challenging the CMS mandate were not likely to succeed on the merits because the Secretary has broad powers to impose conditions upon recipients of federal funds.

Important Takeaways

  • Private employers no longer have to comply with OSHA's ETS. Litigation continues in the lower level, but the Supreme Court has clearly signaled that the ETS would likely be doomed (absent changed circulates) if or when it reaches the Supreme Court again on the merits.
  • Facilities that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding must immediately work to ensure compliance with the "CMS Mandate."
  • WSHB will continue to monitor all developments at the lower courts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
17 January 2022

Supreme Court Prevents OSHA "Vaccine Or Test" Standard From Taking Immediate Effect But Allows Healthcare Worker Mandate To Stand

United States Employment and HR

Contributor

Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman offers world-class representation for clients ranging from individuals to Fortune 500 corporations, with an emphasis on small to middle market firms. We offer services across a comprehensive range of practice areas. By combining decades of experience and in-depth legal knowledge with innovative management and the use of technology, we anticipate problems, seize opportunities and get cases resolved.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More