ARTICLE
30 December 2021

Will Answers Come In 2022? Supreme Court Sets January 7 Hearing On COVID Vaccine Mandates

FL
Foley & Lardner
Contributor
Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
After months of uncertainty, speculation, and numerous contradictory district and circuit court rulings, a Supreme Court announcement on Wednesday evening (December 22)...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Employers, mark your calendars!

After months of uncertainty, speculation, and numerous contradictory district and circuit court rulings, a Supreme Court announcement on Wednesday evening (December 22) has brought employers hope that the new year will bring certainty as to whether or not they are bound to follow the OSHA ETS (for those with 100 or more employees) and the CMS vaccine rule (for staff of many Medicare- and Medicaid-certified health care providers).

In an unprecedented move, the nation's highest court set oral arguments on January 7, 2022 for both (1) emergency applications to stay the district court injunctions that have put the CMS mandate on hold in 25 states and (2) emergency applications to re-impose a stay on the OSHA ETS, which was lifted last week (December 17, 2021).

The Court will not address the third federal mandate, the Federal Contractor Executive Order, at the January 7 hearing. Traditionally, the Supreme Court acts on emergency applications such as these without oral argument and, occasionally, will convert the emergency application to a full hearing on the merits. Here, however, the full court will hear 1-hour oral arguments directly on the emergency applications.

This highly unusual development indicates that the Court desires to provide definitive answers as to whether the federal government's vaccine mandates should be stayed or remain in effect while the various appellate courts analyze the merits of the mandates.

While the January 7 oral arguments and the Court's subsequent ruling will not decide the ultimate fate of the mandates or address any preemption issues (such as whether Florida's recent legislation placing restrictions on COVID-19 vaccination requirements for employees trumps the federal rules), employers can expect some guidance as to whether these mandates will survive and be enforced going forward.

For now, here is a brief summary of the status of each rule:

1. OSHA ETS

The stay on the mandate for large employers has been lifted in all 50 states and the Department of Labor has posted on its website that OSHA will begin enforcing its emergency temporary standard on January 10, 2022. However, the Department also stated that OSHA will give employers more time—until February 9, 2022 —before it will begin issuing citations for violations of the mandate's testing requirements, so long as covered employers are acting in good faith to implement the rule.

Although the rule is currently in effect, this is potentially subject to change pending the upcoming Supreme Court action.

2. CMS Rule

Despite the temporary injunction on the CMS IFC being lifted in 25 states, CMS' website maintains that CMS "has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of [the mandate] pending future developments in the litigation." In other words, CMS is not currently enforcing its vaccine mandate in all states, including those where the mandate is not presently judicially stayed.

However, CMS's position may change following the upcoming Supreme Court action.

3. Federal Contractor Rule

Three federal district courts, in Kentucky, Georgia, and Florida, have enjoined the government from enforcing the vaccine mandate for federal contractors and subcontractors set forth in Executive Order 14042. As of December 14, 2021, the injunctions cover all federal contracts in any state or territory of the United States of America.  As a result, the Office of Management and Budget issued guidance on implementing requirements of Executive Order 14042. The guidance specifically provides that the government will not take action to enforce the federal contractor vaccine mandate at this time.

The Supreme Court has not released any information regarding its plans to address the federal contractor mandate. However, the Justice Department recently filed notices of appeal of the Kentucky and Georgia injunctions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
30 December 2021

Will Answers Come In 2022? Supreme Court Sets January 7 Hearing On COVID Vaccine Mandates

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More