ARTICLE
19 September 2019

Determining Contractor Responsibility

LR
Lewis Roca

Contributor

Lewis Roca logo
Lewis Roca serves clients around the world in complex litigation, intellectual property, business transactions, labor and employment, regulatory counseling, and government relations.  With legal excellence and exceptional client service, we pride ourselves on our ability to win for our clients while serving their highest goals and needs.   
Awards of almost all federal contracts are based on the agency's evaluation of price, technical approach, and contractor responsibility.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Awards of almost all federal contracts are based on the agency's evaluation of price, technical approach, and contractor responsibility. While each factor is vitally important, no contract will be awarded to a contractor found nonresponsible. Responsibility encompasses a broad range of standards. Prospective contractors need to understand these standards and how they are applied.

Policy

The term "responsibility" is used to describe the ability of an offeror to successfully meet its obligations under a contract. Advanced American Construction, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 205, 221 (2013). Subpart 9.1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation prescribes policies, standards, and procedures for determining whether prospective contractors and subcontractors are responsible. FAR 9.100.

Purchases by the federal government can be made from, and contracts shall be awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only. FAR 9.103(a). No purchase or award can be made by a government agency unless the contracting officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. In the absence of information clearly indicating the prospective contractor is responsible, the contracting officer shall make a determination of nonresponsibility. FAR 9.103(b). A prospective contractor must affirmatively demonstrate not only its own responsibility, but also when necessary, the responsibility of its proposed subcontractors. FAR 9.103(c).

The FAR notes that the award of a contract to a supplier based on lowest evaluated price alone can be a false economy if there are subsequent default, late deliveries, or other unsatisfactory performance issues resulting in additional contractual or administrative costs. FAR 9.103(c). Although it is important that government purchases be made at the lowest price, this does not require an award to a contractor solely because that supplier submits the lowest offer. Id.

To read the full article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
19 September 2019

Determining Contractor Responsibility

United States Government, Public Sector

Contributor

Lewis Roca logo
Lewis Roca serves clients around the world in complex litigation, intellectual property, business transactions, labor and employment, regulatory counseling, and government relations.  With legal excellence and exceptional client service, we pride ourselves on our ability to win for our clients while serving their highest goals and needs.   
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More