San Francisco And Montana Pass Campaign Finance Regulations Affecting Government Contractors

AG
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Contributor

Akin is a law firm focused on providing extraordinary client service, a rewarding environment for our diverse workforce and exceptional legal representation irrespective of ability to pay. The deep transactional, litigation, regulatory and policy experience we bring to client engagements helps us craft innovative, effective solutions and strategies.
The executive order aims to shed light on political activity by government contractors that was not previously required to be disclosed.
United States Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On June 8, 2018, Montana Gov. Steve Bullock signed an executive order requiring recipients of major government contracts to disclose certain political activities. All business entities seeking contracts valued at more than $25,000 for services or $50,000 for goods will be required to disclose certain political expenditures made within two years prior to the submission of their bid or offer. Among other activity, the executive order will require disclosure of expenditures on “electioneering communications,” which include advertisements that identify specific candidates or refer to a political party, ballot issue or other question in Montana elections. The executive order aims to shed light on political activity by government contractors that was not previously required to be disclosed.

San Francisco also recently passed legislation aimed at increasing transparency of city contractor political activity. Among other provisions, the legislation will double the pay-to-play “restricted period,” prohibiting city contractors from making contributions to the elected official, or candidates for the elected office, that approved the contract for up to one year after the approval of the contract. Additionally, any political committee receiving more than $10,000 from a business entity must disclose one of the principal officers of the donor and whether the business entity has a contract with the city. The ordinance is effective June 29, 2018.

States and localities are increasingly enacting new rules to disclose political activity that is not required to be disclosed at the federal level. Politically active companies that contract with government entities should regularly review state and local disclosure laws to ensure compliance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

San Francisco And Montana Pass Campaign Finance Regulations Affecting Government Contractors

United States Government, Public Sector

Contributor

Akin is a law firm focused on providing extraordinary client service, a rewarding environment for our diverse workforce and exceptional legal representation irrespective of ability to pay. The deep transactional, litigation, regulatory and policy experience we bring to client engagements helps us craft innovative, effective solutions and strategies.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More