CFPB Examines Credit Card Late Fees

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
In 2009, Congress enacted the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In 2009, Congress enacted the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act). Among other things, the CARD Act curtailed a range of junk fees, coercive contract clauses, and other suspicious practices. In 2010, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors' (Fed) voted to implement provisions of the CARD Act that required penalties to be "reasonable and proportional to the omission or violation." While the Fed prohibited collecting excessive late fee penalties, the Fed also included a provision that allowed credit card issuers to escape enforcement scrutiny if they set fees at or below a particular level, which may be adjusted annually for inflation (immunity provision). Currently, Regulation Z, which implements the CARD Act, sets forth a safe harbor of $30 for fees generally, with exceptions and alternatives for specific scenarios.

On June 22, 2022, the CFPB initiated a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeking information regarding the Fed's 2010 immunity provision for excessive late fees that allows credit card companies to escape enforcement scrutiny. In this NPRM, the CFPB is assessing whether these late fees are "reasonable and proportional" as they have costed consumers $12 billion each year, making up 10 percent of the total cost of credit cards to customers.

The NPRM asks the public:

  • How do credit card issuers set late fee amounts? How is the fee determined to be considered reasonable or proportionate or at least related to the actual costs to the card issuer? How is the fee related to the statement balance?
  • Are revenue goals a factor in determining late fees? How do they figure into profitability for the card issuers?
  • What are card issuers' costs and losses associated with late payments?
  • Do late fees have a deterrent effect? Does the amount have a deterrent effect? Do card issuers impose other consequences other than late fees when payments are late?
  • What methods are card issuers using to encourage timely payments, including autopay and notifications?
  • How many calendar days after the due date do consumers make the late payment? For example, what percentage of accounts is less than 24 hours late versus 30 days late?
  • For card issuers, what annual income is coming from interest and fees? What are annual expenses?

Comments are due July 22, 2022.

Putting It Into Practice: In practice, the CFPB contends that revenue collected from these late fees comes disproportionately from people living in low-income neighborhoods. Additionally, 18 of the top 20 credit card issuers set late fees at or near the established maximum level. The revenue generated from late fees make up a noteworthy portion of the total profit for these credit card companies. CFPB Director Rohit Chopra commented, "[t]his [NPRM] is particularly timely since current rules might give companies the incentive to impose big hikes based on inflation."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More