ARTICLE
19 January 2023

Insurers Beware Of "Silent Crypto" Exposure: PART III, Silent Crypto Exposure For Lawyers

WE
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Contributor

More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
The recent implosion of crypto firm FTX and its affiliates provides a case study for potential crypto exposure under traditional insurance policies in this series...
United States Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The recent implosion of crypto firm FTX and its affiliates provides a case study for potential crypto exposure under traditional insurance policies in this series of four articles: Silent Crypto for D&O and Corporate Liability Insurance (Part I), Silent Crypto Exposure for Accountants (Part II), Silent Crypto Exposure for Lawyers (Part III), and Crime and Custody Coverage for Crypto Assets (Part IV).

Silent Crypto Exposure for Lawyers

Like other professional services providers, lawyers are not immune from potential liability exposure in connection with providing legal advice and services to crypto firms as the regulatory landscape continues to evolve in a choppy and uncertain fashion. Indeed, more firms and participants in the burgeoning ecosystem for blockchain, cryptocurrency and digital assets are engaging lawyers as a hedge against their own potential liability exposure as it becomes increasingly clear that there will be greater regulatory oversight and scrutiny of crypto firms doing business in the United States and abroad.

Many law firms purchase Lawyers Professional Liability (LPL) insurance policies, which typically afford coverage for claims first made against attorneys in rendering professional legal services to clients for a fee. These claims frequently are brought by the law firms' clients in the form of a legal malpractice lawsuit alleging negligence, errors or omissions in rendering (or failing to render) appropriate legal services or advice. Carriers issue policies based on the area of law in which the applicant attorney typically practices, which may be broad, but all policies contain exclusions that must be reviewed. Attorneys may purchase LPL policies that afford expanded coverage for legal services provided by lawyers acting in a fiduciary capacity or providing investment advice. This is particularly noteworthy where the lines of law, business, finance and investments may blur.

The insurance market also offers a specialized product known as Employed Lawyers coverage, which is typically added by endorsement to corporate D&O policies or Management Liability Insurance policies. This coverage is intended to insure the acts, errors or omissions of in-house corporate counsel – but solely in connection with rendering legal services in their capacity as an employee of the insured organization.

Recent events in the crypto markets, including the fall of the fourth-largest crypto exchange, FTX, highlight the various unresolved legal issues that can trip up attorneys who provide advice to individuals or entities engaged in creating, buying, selling, trading, lending, retaining custody or other transactions involving cryptocurrency or digital assets.

Some legal issues that have caught crypto firms and their lawyers off guard include:

  • Appropriate legal structure of the entity
  • Where the entity should be domiciled
  • Constantly evolving global regulatory landscape for crypto firms and digital assets
  • Whether the firm should be registered or licensed to transact business in different jurisdictions
  • Whether the firm is subject to oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for dealing in "securities"
  • Whether the firm is subject to oversight by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) for dealing in "commodities"
  • Whether the firm is a "money services business"
  • Whether the firm is subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and anti–money laundering laws
  • Whether the firm's customer Terms of Service are appropriate and being followed
  • Tax treatment for cryptocurrencies and digital assets
  • The attorney's personal interest in the firm as an investor, shareholder or stakeholder
  • Whether attorneys have appropriately (or correctly) advised individual directors or officers about potential personal exposure.

Lawyers who intend to provide such advice should be careful to set client expectations in this uncertain and largely untested legal environment for crypto firms, keep abreast of new developments, and recalibrate legal advice and recommendations as the regulatory landscape evolves.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
19 January 2023

Insurers Beware Of "Silent Crypto" Exposure: PART III, Silent Crypto Exposure For Lawyers

United States Technology

Contributor

More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More