ARTICLE
13 January 2023

Double Standard: USEPA Approves Transition To New ASTM Environmental Site Assessment Standard

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP
Contributor
Shipman & Goodwin LLP  logo
Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
In practice, since the release of ASTM E1527-21, we have seen many environmental consultants issue Phase I ESAs that satisfy both ASTM standards.
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On December 15, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made the much-anticipated announcement to formally adopt updated standards for Phase I environmental site assessments (ESAs), despite some initial negative feedback from the regulated community during the rulemaking process. The new standards will have an important impact on how buyers, sellers, lenders/investors and others manage environmental due diligence, particularly in connection with evaluating risks associated with former industrial and manufacturing sites.

Effective February 13, 2023, EPA amended its All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Rule to confirm that the ASTM E1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments replaces (subject to the sunset period noted below) the prior standard (ASTM E1527-13) and satisfies the requirements for conducting due diligence sufficient to satisfy the AAI standard under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and thereby permit entities to qualify for its statutory environmental liability protections. See the Federal Register link here.

Among other updates and revisions in the new standard, importantly, ASTM E1527-21 provides guidance with respect to addressing emerging contaminants, including per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are not yet listed as "hazardous substances" under CERCLAE1527-21 recommends evaluating PFAS and other emerging contaminants as Non-Scope Considerations either when requested by the "User" of the Phase I or to satisfy requirements in states that already have established regulatory standards for PFAS, which could result in PFAS or other Non-Scope Considerations being identified as a Business Environmental Risk.

The new standard also provides a number of other changes from the prior ASTM standard, including: slightly revised definitions for Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), Controlled RECs and Historical RECs; clarifying what constitutes a "significant" data gap; and extending how long a Phase I report is valid (provided certain sections are updated). For ease of review, EPA developed a comparison of the two ASTM standards as part of the rulemaking process. See Regulations.gov link here.

In terms of timing, EPA's final rule provides for a one-year sunset of the prior standard, which can still be used to satisfy the AAI requirements for Phase Is completed before February 13, 2024. In practice, since the release of ASTM E1527-21, we have seen many environmental consultants issue Phase I ESAs that satisfy both ASTM standards.

Lastly, while ASTM E1527-21 (and ASTM E1527-13 until February 2024) will satisfy AAI requirements under CERCLA, it is important to emphasize that complying solely with the ASTM standards when conducting Phase I ESAs may not be sufficient to ensure compliance with state-specific requirements (or lender/investor environmental underwriting requirements). For example, for sites in Connecticut subject to the Connecticut Transfer Act (see our prior alert regarding the Connecticut Transfer Act and related developments here), the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection's 2010 Site Characterization Guidance Document includes additional requirements for performing Phase Is that go above and beyond ASTM standards.

In light of the above, those conducting environmental due diligence – or relying on diligence conducted for or performed by others – should consult with knowledgeable environmental professionals (consultants and counsel) early in the process to develop a coordinated environmental due diligence strategy and appropriate scope for the particular site(s), future use and business drivers, particularly if PFAS or other emerging contaminants are a potential concern.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
13 January 2023

Double Standard: USEPA Approves Transition To New ASTM Environmental Site Assessment Standard

United States Environment
Contributor
Shipman & Goodwin LLP  logo
Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More