Facial Recognition Technology Takes A Step Back

PC
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
Contributor
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
The EDPB explains that the proposed use of Clearview AI's technology implies sharing personal data with it, a privately held company established and operating outside the EU.
European Union Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a letter sent to the European Parliament, the panel of data protection authorities of the member states of the European Union (the European Data Protection Board – EDPB) expressed its concern regarding European police forces' and enforcement agencies' use of facial recognition app developed by Clearview AI, a US-based technology company.

The EDPB explains that the proposed use of Clearview AI's technology implies sharing personal data with it, a privately held company established and operating outside the EU. It also involves the biometric matching of such shared data against the company's mass and arbitrarily populated database of photographs and facial pictures accessible online. The EDPB noted that such processing lacks a legal basis and does not comply with the necessity requirement in the EU Law Enforcement Directive – the data protection legislation adopted alongside the GDPR in 2016 and governs law enforcement agencies' personal data processing activities.

The EDPB also noted that the processing would also require the transfer of personal data of EU residents to the United States, where Clearview AI is established, and that such transfer would not be subject to the provisions of the EU-US Privacy Shield adequacy decision, nor to the EU-US Umbrella Agreement on law enforcement data sharing. To be lawful, such a transfer would have to comply with the strict conditions and requirements on cross-border data transfer set out in the Law Enforcement Directive.

Some of the concern that the EDPB expressed about the use of facial recognition technology is also shared by world-leading technology companies who decided either to suspend or completely terminate their facial recognition projects. IBM announced that it will cease its AI development projects due to concerns that the technology will be used for mass surveillance, racial profiling, and violations of basic human rights and freedoms. Amazon announced it will cease its AI development for a year, calling upon the US Congress to adopt ethical rules for the use of facial recognition technology. Microsoft announced that it will not sell facial recognition solutions to police forces in the United States until such use is regulated by federal law.

CLICK HERE to read the EDPB's statement on Clearview AI's technology.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Facial Recognition Technology Takes A Step Back

European Union Privacy
Contributor
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More