ARTICLE
5 December 2019

Legal Risks Expand For Directors Who Fail To Monitor Companies' Cybersecurity Practices And Compliance

AG
Archer & Greiner P.C.
Contributor
Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
Corporate directors who leave cybersecurity and data privacy compliance to management may run a substantial risk of personal liability if they turn a blind eye toward the adequacy of management's response.
United States Compliance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Corporate directors who leave cybersecurity and data privacy compliance to management may run a substantial risk of personal liability if they turn a blind eye toward the adequacy of management's response.

The trend in many legal quarters toward imposing upon businesses affirmative duties to implement measures to help prevent data breaches and comply with ever-expanding data privacy regulation—and liability if they fail to do so—has brought increased scrutiny of the actions, or more likely inactions, of corporate directors in the cybersecurity arena. A series of cases applying Delaware law, culminating in the June 2019 opinion in Marchand v. Barnhill, 212 A.3d 805, 824 (Del. 2019), indicate that directors who leave cybersecurity and data privacy compliance to management may run a substantial risk of personal liability if they turn a blind eye toward the adequacy of management's response. These developments are of interest to New Jersey attorneys who advise companies on these matters, because many in-state corporations were incorporated in Delaware and because many states, including New Jersey, follow many aspects of Delaware corporate law. In re Merck & Co. Sec., Derivative & ERISA Litig., 493 F.3d 393, 399 (3d Cir. 2007).

Previously published in the New Jersey Law Journal - November 2019

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
5 December 2019

Legal Risks Expand For Directors Who Fail To Monitor Companies' Cybersecurity Practices And Compliance

United States Compliance
Contributor
Archer & Greiner is now Archer. But what matters most is what remains the same. Our new name still represents an unwavering commitment to delivering large-firm expertise with small-firm attention—no matter the size of the client. It’s a philosophy that’s helped us grow into one of the largest and most trusted law firms in the Mid-Atlantic region, serving businesses and individuals throughout the region and in a growing number of other states and jurisdictions. With a network of regional offices from Delaware to New York, Archer has more than 175 lawyers practicing in all major legal disciplines including corporate, labor, commercial litigation, family, real estate and many more.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More