EPA Proposes TSCA Amendments To Improve Efficiency Of New Chemical Review Process

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") announced a proposed rule to amend the new chemicals procedural regulations under TSCA. This proposal follows the 2016...
United States Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") announced a proposed rule to amend the new chemicals procedural regulations under TSCA. This proposal follows the 2016 enactment of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (the "Lautenberg Act"), which requires EPA to make an affirmative determination on whether each new chemical substance presents an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment under known, intended, or reasonably foreseeable conditions of use. In addition to aligning applicable procedural rules in the Code of Federal Regulations with the requirements of section 5 of TSCA, as amended by the Lautenberg Act, the proposed rule is intended to improve the efficiency of EPA's review processes.

Under the new rule, EPA would be required to make a determination on each premanufacture, significant new use, and microbial commercial activity notice before the submitter may commence manufacturing or processing the chemical substance that is the subject of the notice. The proposed rule additionally clarifies the information to be submitted in premanufacture, significant new use, and exemption notices, in the following categories: physical and chemical properties and environmental fate characteristics; categories of use; details concerning manufacture, processing, and use; worker exposure; environmental releases; and pollution prevention information.

EPA is also proposing changes for low volume exemptions ("LVEs") and low release and exposure exemptions ("LoREXs"). Submitters of exemption notices would not be able to commence manufacture (including import) until EPA has approved the LVE or LoREX notice. Under the proposed rule, PFAS would be categorically ineligible for LVEs and LoREXs. EPA additionally proposes to codify its 1999 PBT policy, meaning that chemical substances under LVE or LoREX review that are determined to be a PBT with anticipated environmental releases and potentially unreasonable exposures to humans or environmental organisms are ineligible for an LVE or LoREX.

Comments must be received on or before 60 days after the proposed rule's publication in the Federal Register.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

EPA Proposes TSCA Amendments To Improve Efficiency Of New Chemical Review Process

United States Environment

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More