Is It Conceivable In 2022 That Companies Still Do Not Enjoy Effective Judicial Review Of The Way Commission Inspections Are Implemented?

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. With extensive reach across four continents, we are the only integrated law firm in the world with approximately 200 lawyers in each of the world’s three largest financial centers—New York, London and Hong Kong—the backbone of the global economy. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.

Explore

Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, partner, discusses in an article entitled "Is it conceivable in 2022 that companies still do not enjoy effective judicial review of the way Commission inspections are implemented?"

UK Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Authors

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Nathalie Jalabert-Doury, partner, discusses in an article entitled "Is it conceivable in 2022 that companies still do not enjoy effective judicial review of the way Commission inspections are implemented?" extracted from Professor Emeritus Laurence Idot's Liber Amicorum, a serious legality issue under EC Regulation n°1/2003, the insufficiency of remedies available, and the potential evolution arising from Court judgments in other fields.

Summary :

Inspections ordered by the European Commission by decision are mandatory for companies concerned, subject to penalties and even the implementation of a dawn raid under the control of French police officers. However, the decision to carry out an inspection is not subject to any prior judicial review, and the available ex post judicial review of the measures taken on the basis of the inspection decision cannot be considered compliant with the European Convention of Human Rights. The European Court of Justice has already taken several steps to improve the situation, but these improvements remain partial and insufficient. This article advocates a real step forward in this area in order to ensure consistency of the European Court of Justice's case law with that of the European Court of Human Rights.

Downloads – Download Document

Originally published by Laurence Idot Liber Amicorum (French language), 07 July 2022

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.