ARTICLE
21 December 2022

Air Drop - UK Court Allows Service Of Proceedings Through NFT

WF
William Fry

Contributor

William Fry is a leading full-service Irish law firm with over 310 legal and tax professionals and 460 staff. The firm's client-focused service combines technical excellence with commercial awareness and a practical, constructive approach to business issues. The firm advices leading domestic and international corporations, financial institutions and government organisations. It regularly acts on complex, multi-jurisdictional transactions and commercial disputes.
D'Aloia v Persons Unknown & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 involved an application from Mr Fabrizio D'Aloia for interim injunctive relief in the UK, following an alleged fraudulent...
UK Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

D'Aloia v Persons Unknown & Others [2022] EWHC 1723 involved an application from Mr Fabrizio D'Aloia for interim injunctive relief in the UK, following an alleged fraudulent misrepresentation of cryptocurrency by persons unknown.

Mr D'Aloia claimed that the persons unknown misrepresented itself as being connected with a legitimate US-regulated business called TD Ameritrade. He deposited cryptocurrency "stablecoins" (so-called digital dollars, which are 'pegged' to the value of the USD) totalling 2.1 million USDT and 230,000 USD Coin into two digital wallets, but his trading account was blocked after he submitted a withdrawal request. By the end of May 2022, Mr D'Aloia realised that he was the victim of fraud and issued proceedings in the UK against the people behind the fraudulent website – persons unknown – and six other defendants said to be operators or controllers of the exchanges.

Decision

The UK High Court (Court) was satisfied that there was sufficient justification to allow service of proceedings outside the jurisdiction. The Court found that the claim fell within the jurisdictional "gateways" under the UK court rules, and so the UK courts had jurisdiction to hear the claim.

Mr D'Aloia sought permission to serve the proceedings through Non-Fungible Token (NFT). He claimed that airdropping the documents by this means would embed the service in the blockchain.

In a novel decision, the Court held that service by way of NFT was "likely to lead to a greater prospect" of those behind the fraudulent website being put on notice of the making of the order, and the commencement of the proceedings. Mr D'Aloia was therefore granted leave to serve the proceedings through NFT (and by e-mail).

Conclusion

While personal service is still the standard in Ireland, the High Court has, in the past, allowed proceedings to be served via Facebook and LinkedIn. Given the rise of blockchain technology in the Irish market, it is likely only a matter of time before an application for service by NFT comes before the Irish courts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More