ARTICLE
7 November 2008

New Disability Ruling Announced

ML
Muckle LLP
Contributor
The European Court of Justice delivered a significant ruling earlier this year which extends the scope of the UK disability discrimination legislation to those who are discriminated against because of their association with a disabled person but who are not themselves disabled.
UK Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered a significant ruling earlier this year which extends the scope of the UK disability discrimination legislation to those who are discriminated against because of their association with a disabled person but who are not themselves disabled. Until now only a person who was disabled could bring a claim under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA).

Case Law

In Coleman v Attridge Law, the ECJ confirmed that the EU framework Directive does prohibit disability by association thereby finding the UK's implementation of European disability discrimination protection inadequate. The facts are not uncommon so the implications for employees and employers are potentially huge.

Sharon Coleman who worked as a legal secretary brought a claim of disability discrimination and constructive dismissal against her ex-employer claiming that she had been treated less favourably than other employees because of her son's disability. Ms Coleman's son was born with substantial respiratory problems and she had put in a request for more flexible working hours in order to care for him. She contended that other mothers at the firm had been granted flexible working hours and permission to work from home to care for children who were not disabled, whereas her request was turned down and she was placed in a pool of staff selected for redundancy. She also claimed to have been subjected to insulting and abusive comments as a result of her request and that this created a hostile working environment which gave her no option but to resign.

Ms Coleman argued that the failure of the DDA to recognise discrimination or harassment of a non-disabled person on the grounds of their association with someone with a disability provided much narrower protection in this area than other areas of discrimination legislation, for example the Race Relations Act. She also argued that it does not accord with the much wider wording and interpretation of the Framework Directive.

The tribunal considered that the wording of the Directive was not sufficiently clear so as to expressly protect against claims of discrimination by association and referred the matter to the ECJ for a ruling.

Result

The ECJ has confirmed that the Directive prohibits discrimination by association. The employment tribunal dealing with the Coleman case will need to consider whether the wording of the DDA can reasonably be interpreted in that way for her claim to proceed. A suggestion from the tribunal was that the words "or a person associated with a disabled person" might be added to this current catergory of discrimination to give proper effect to the Directive. The Government may choose to adopt similar wording in due course to cover all employers. In the meantime, public sector employers, to whom the Framework Directive applies directly, will need to review their actions very carefully.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
7 November 2008

New Disability Ruling Announced

UK Employment and HR
Contributor
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More