Mauritius' Environment Land Use Appeal Tribunal Delivers Ground Breaking Fish Farming Project Judgment

E
ENS
Contributor
ENS is an independent law firm with over 200 years of experience. The firm has over 600 practitioners in 14 offices on the continent, in Ghana, Mauritius, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda.
The Association Des Hoteliers et Restaurateurs Ile Maurice ("AHRIM"), an association of hotels and restaurants in Mauritius, and the Sea Users Association, an association of civilians, recently won an important appeal
South Africa Environment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Association Des Hoteliers et Restaurateurs Ile Maurice (“AHRIM”), an association of hotels and restaurants in Mauritius, and the Sea Users Association, an association of civilians, recently won an important appeal against the grant of an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) licence to a fish farming project by the Minister of Social Security, National Solidarity, and Environment and Sustainable Development.

In allowing the appeal, the Tribunal emphasised the shortcomings of the conditions attached to the granting of the EIA licence, the inadequacy of the risk mitigating measures proposed by the promoter, and the insufficiency of information provided by the promoter in its EIA report.

The Tribunal stressed the absence of knowledge on the increased shark risk attached to the proposed fishing project. In this regard, the Tribunal held that the precautionary principle adopted by Mauritius ought to be applied in the absence of concrete data on shark risk and shark circulation in Mauritius. The Tribunal questioned how the ministries involved could have been satisfied that an EIA licence could be granted in the absence of knowledge on the risk of increased shark circulation around the proposed project and what effect this would have.

The Tribunal further ruled that the decision to grant the EIA licence was tainted in view of the conflict of interest of the Ministry of Ocean Economy, Marine Resources, Fisheries and Shipping who, despite its involvement in the project in providing land-based operations and facilities to the promoter, exercised its voting rights for the recommendation in favour of the fish farming project and was to play a role in the subsequent monitoring of the said project.

This judgment is an important step in the development of environmental law in Mauritius.

An appeal is currently pending against the judgment of the Environment Land Use Appeal Tribunal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mauritius' Environment Land Use Appeal Tribunal Delivers Ground Breaking Fish Farming Project Judgment

South Africa Environment
Contributor
ENS is an independent law firm with over 200 years of experience. The firm has over 600 practitioners in 14 offices on the continent, in Ghana, Mauritius, Namibia, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More