ARTICLE
21 September 2021

COMESA Shows It Means Business

Tf
Tabacks (formerly Andersen Za)
Contributor
Tabacks (formerly Andersen Za) logo
As a full service super-boutique legal practice, we are committed to providing cost effective, quality and agile legal services, whilst developing a deep understanding of your business. With more than 25 years of active service in South Africa and an ethos built on client service, our value proposition lies in the fact that we are a progressive practice able to deliver high-quality, cost-effective and transparent legal solutions, customised for client specific needs both locally and abroad. We believe we are uniquely placed to ensure that your business succeeds.
In a first for cross-border merger regulation in Africa, a fine has been issued by the COMESA Competition Commission (Commission) for the failure to notify a merger within the prescribed timelines.
South Africa Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a first for cross-border merger regulation in Africa, a fine has been issued by the COMESA Competition Commission (Commission) for the failure to notify a merger within the prescribed timelines.

In the proposed acquisition by Helios Towers Limited of the shares in Madagascar Towers S.A and Malawi Towers Limited, the parties were fined 0.05% of their combined turnover for the 2020 Financial Year for failing to notify the acquisition to the Commission within the prescribed 30 day period from the date of the parties 'decision to merge'. In this press release [(available at the Commission noted that a decision to merge was executed on 23 March 2021, being the date the Share Sale and Purchase Agreement for the proposed transaction was signed, but the proposed merger was only notified on 2 July 2021, pursuant to Article 24(3) of the Regulations.

Article 24(3) of the COMESA Competition Regulations of 2004 (the Regulations) provides that a party to a notifiable merger must notify the Commission (in writing) of the proposed merger as soon as it is practicable, but not later than 30 days after the parties' 'decision to merge'. The term 'decision to merge' is not defined in the Regulations, but it has historically been assumed that the decision occurs on the date that the merger agreement is signed. This has been confirmed by the latest decision.

Interestingly, although the filing of notifiable mergers is mandatory, once notified, the parties to a merger can implement their transaction whilst waiting for approval, unlike in most other jurisdictions where the parties must wait for merger clearance before implementation.

COMESA is a regional organisation forming a common market, whose 19 member states are Burundi, Comoros, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sudan, Swaziland, Uganda, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

The Regulations govern competition in COMESA and apply to all economic activity within or having an effect in the common market. Cross-border merger control became a reality on 14 January 2013 through the gazetting of the Regulations which enables the Commission to investigate mergers with a regional dimension, being those where the merging parties operate in two or more COMESA member states.

Articles 24(4) and 24(5) of the Regulations confer jurisdiction upon the Commission to impose penalties where parties to a notifiable merger fail to notify timeously, with such penalties limited to 10% of the merging parties' annual turnover in the common market. In determining the first ever penalty, the Commission applied mitigation factors such as the cooperation given by the parties and the fact that the merger did not result in any loss or harm in the market.

The issuing of the fine serves as a warning to companies wishing to pursue acquisitions in the common market that merger control is being actively enforced.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
21 September 2021

COMESA Shows It Means Business

South Africa Antitrust/Competition Law
Contributor
Tabacks (formerly Andersen Za) logo
As a full service super-boutique legal practice, we are committed to providing cost effective, quality and agile legal services, whilst developing a deep understanding of your business. With more than 25 years of active service in South Africa and an ethos built on client service, our value proposition lies in the fact that we are a progressive practice able to deliver high-quality, cost-effective and transparent legal solutions, customised for client specific needs both locally and abroad. We believe we are uniquely placed to ensure that your business succeeds.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More