PRESS RELEASE
30 September 2021

Intellectual property case briefing discussion event

BP
Bennett & Philp Lawyers

Contributor

Bennett & Philp are lawyers who understand the real world. We offer practical legal solutions across every stage of life and business and with multi-disciplinary experts across five practice areas – Business Advisory, Intellectual Property, Disputes and Litigation, Property and Real Estate and Wills and Estates.
Al and Inventorship: Our creations can create, so where to from here?
Australia
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Al and Inventorship: Our creations can create, so where to from here?

On Friday, 17 September 2021, the Intellectual Property team at Bennett & Philp hosted its second Case Briefing Discussion event for the year at Brisbane City Hall presented by Dr Amanda-Jane George.

The event started with our Senior Associate, Michael Finney introducing the topic and our guest speaker, Dr Amanda-Jane George.

77774a.jpg
Michael Finney starting the event

The topic of this session was the recent Federal Court decision of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879. The decision was handed down on 30 July 2021 and since that time has created considerable buzz worldwide for being the first decision of its kind. In Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 his Honour Justice Beach found that artificial intelligence software (DABUS) could be an "inventor" for the purposes of section 15 of the Patents Act 1995 (and the regulations to that Act) and that the patentable invention invented by DABUS could be owned by Dr Thaler as he was the ultimate controller of and derived title from DABUS.

Dr George presented and analysed the arguments raised before Justice Beach and in similar proceedings in the UK, European and US courts. The discussion after Dr George's presentation traversed such issues as public policy concerns; what it may mean for practice (for example, in terms of the qualities of skilled addresses in respect of inventions created by artificial intelligence); the (potential) implications of the decision if it continues to be the law in Australia (including that our patent law will fall out of step with our major trading partners); the likelihood the decision will be overturned on appeal; and speculation as to the motives of Dr Thaler.

77774b.jpg
Dr Amanda-Jane George presenting

Dr Thaler has filed similar suits in multiple jurisdictions, and has so far only been successful in Australia. The decision is currently on appeal to the Full Federal Court of Australia.

The event was very well-received, and we are grateful to Dr George for her time and for the quality of her presentation and discussion. We would like to thank our guests for joining us and making the event an enjoyable and thought provoking occasion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

PRESS RELEASE
30 September 2021

Intellectual property case briefing discussion event

Australia

Contributor

Bennett & Philp are lawyers who understand the real world. We offer practical legal solutions across every stage of life and business and with multi-disciplinary experts across five practice areas – Business Advisory, Intellectual Property, Disputes and Litigation, Property and Real Estate and Wills and Estates.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More