ARTICLE
27 December 2018

India's Leap Into Formalised Electronic Survelliance: The MHA Statutory Order 6227(E) Dated 20.12.2018

CA
Clarus Law Associates

Contributor

Clarus Law Associates logo
Clarus Law Associates was established in 2007. We are dedicated to professional excellence, personal and high-quality support and effective solution-oriented legal services. Our main practice areas are: Energy, Projects and Project Finance: Urban Infrastructure, Complex Project Disputes, Investment and Trade Law Advice, Projects and Project Finance: Transportation, Real Estate Development: SEZs, FTWZs, Corporate Transactions, Policy and Legislative Review, International Dispute Resolution.
The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, by means of an Order 6227(E) dated 20.12.2018 issued under s. 69(1) of The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 ("IT Act") ...
India Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, by means of an Order 6227(E) dated 20.12.2018 issued under s. 69(1) of The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 ("IT Act") read with Rule 4 of the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009 ("IT Safeguard Rules") has authorised ten (10) Central Government agencies 1 to undertake interception, monitoring and decryption of any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resource under the IT Act.

Section 69 IT Act, authorises the Central Government and the State Government to direct any agency of the appropriate Government to intercept, monitor or decrypt any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resource. This may be done if the Central or State Government, as the case may be, is satisfied that it is necessary to do so in the interest of the sovereignty or integrity of India, defence of India, security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States or public order. This may also be done in the interest of public order or for preventing incitement to the commission of any cognizable offence relating to the same, or for investigation of such offences. For s.69 IT Act to become effective, it was necessary for the Central Government to have notified rules prescribing the "procedure and safeguards" governing the exercise of power under s.69 IT Act.

Accordingly, the Central Government had notified, on 27.10.2009, the Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Interception, Monitoring and Decryption of Information) Rules, 2009 ("IT Safeguard Rules"). Under the IT Safeguard Rules, "competent authority" for the Central Government has been defined as the Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Rule 4 of the IT Safeguard Rules permits the competent authority to authorise any agency of the Government to intercept, monitor or decrypt information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resource (as defined under the IT Act).

No person can carry out the interception or monitoring or decryption of any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resource except by an order issued by the competent authority as per Rule 3 of the IT Safeguard Rules.

On 20.12.2018, the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs issued an order (S.O. 6227(E)) under Section 69(1), IT Act read with Rule 4, IT Safeguard Rules and authorised ten security and intelligence agencies for purposes of interception, monitoring, decryption of any information generated, transmitted, received or stored in any computer resource.

It should be noted that,  the penalty prescribed under Section 69(4) of IT Act, any person (or subscriber or intermediary as defined under the IT Act) who refuses to assist the said security and intelligence agencies shall be punished with a period of imprisonment which may extend up to 7 years and shall also be liable to fine.

This Order 6227(E) dated 20.12.2018 ,therefore, brings into effect a regime in India under which, the identified ten (10)  Central Government agencies, have been vested with the authority undertake complete and continuous surveillance of electronic messages transmitted or stored in any manner.

Piyush is a Partner and Prithviraj is an Associate at Clarus Law Associates.

Footnote

1 (i) Intelligence Bureau, (ii) Narcotics Control Bureau, (iii) Enforcement Directorate, (iv) Central Board of Direct Taxes, (v) Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, (vi) Central Bureau of Investigation, (vii) National Investigation Agency, (viii)  Cabinet Secretariat (RAW), (ix) Directorate of Signal Intelligence (for service areas of Jammu& Kashmir, North East, and Assam only) and (ix) Commissioner of Police, Delhi.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
27 December 2018

India's Leap Into Formalised Electronic Survelliance: The MHA Statutory Order 6227(E) Dated 20.12.2018

India Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Contributor

Clarus Law Associates logo
Clarus Law Associates was established in 2007. We are dedicated to professional excellence, personal and high-quality support and effective solution-oriented legal services. Our main practice areas are: Energy, Projects and Project Finance: Urban Infrastructure, Complex Project Disputes, Investment and Trade Law Advice, Projects and Project Finance: Transportation, Real Estate Development: SEZs, FTWZs, Corporate Transactions, Policy and Legislative Review, International Dispute Resolution.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More