ARTICLE
18 November 2019

California Prohibits Mandatory Employment Arbitration

M
Mintz
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 51 into law, which means that effective January 1, 2020, employers will (purportedly)
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed AB 51 into law, which means that effective January 1, 2020, employers will (purportedly) be prohibited from requiring employees to consent to mandatory arbitration of employment claims. Here is what your business needs to do now:

Provisions and Prohibitions

Employers are now prohibited, pursuant to California Labor Code section 432, from requiring an applicant for employment (or employee) to "waive any right, forum, or procedure" for an alleged violation of FEHA or the Labor Code generally.

The key word here is "requiring" – nothing prohibits an applicant or employee from voluntarily agreeing to arbitrate – provided that "voluntary agreement" does not take the form of an "opt-out" provision. In other words, the employee must willingly agree to participate in the alternate dispute resolution procedure.

Significantly, AB 51 prohibits employers from threatening, retaliating or discriminating against an applicant or employee for refusing to waive any right, forum, or procedure, such as if the applicant refused to consent to arbitrate a potential FEHA claim. In fact, the new law makes a violation of its provisions a misdemeanor.

Exclusions and Potential Challenges

The new law does not apply to post-dispute settlement agreements or negotiated severance agreements. In addition, AB 51 attempts to situate itself as a bill focused on ensuring consent of parties entering into arbitration agreement and it specifically states that it does not override anything "otherwise enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act." Given California's past dust-ups with the FAA, however, we predict a challenge to the new law on this basis.

Employer's Arbitration To-Do List

In the absence of a successful legal challenge, employers should assume the legislation is valid and will take effect as scheduled. Toward that end, we suggest that:

  • Employers without arbitration agreements should consider implementing them now before AB 51's January 1, 2020 effective date;
  • Employers implementing arbitration programs after January 1, 2020 should consider revising their arbitration agreements to include specific language that recognizes Labor Code 432.6 and the voluntary nature of the agreement;
  • Employers may want to narrow the scope of arbitration agreements beginning January 1, 2020 to cover only non-FEHA and Labor Code claims such as breach of contract or tort; or
  • Employers may wish to completely suspend the implementation of employment arbitration agreements as of January 1, 2020 until the enforceability of AB 51 is resolved and we can provide more precise guidance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
18 November 2019

California Prohibits Mandatory Employment Arbitration

United States Employment and HR
Contributor
Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More