ARTICLE
26 November 2015

Operation Of Landfills On Reserve Lands: Evolving Area Of The Law

NR
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP logo
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. The firm has more than 4,000 lawyers and other legal staff based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.
The underlying action concerns the operation of a landfill on reserve lands. Atlantic Waste Systems Ltd. operated a landfill on reserve lands pursuant to a lease from the federal government.
Canada Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Atlantic Waste Systems Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 BCSC 1998, the British Columbia Supreme Court was recently asked to decide whether the British Columbia Environmental Management Act ("EMA") applies to First Nation reserve lands.  While the Court refused to decide the issue at this time, this is an important decision to watch.

The underlying action concerns the operation of a landfill on reserve lands.  Atlantic Waste Systems Ltd. operated a landfill on reserve lands pursuant to a lease from the federal government.  In 2011, the government terminated the lease.  Atlantic sued for damages, alleging wrongful termination.  In response, the government brought a counterclaim against Atlantic, Mr. Mann (a director and officer of Atlantic) and Hemmera Envirochem Inc. (Atlantic's environmental consultant).  Among other things, the government alleged that the landfill operation contributed to contamination of soil and groundwater on the reserve. 

Among other causes of action, the government made a cost recovery claim under the EMA.  In response, Hemmera applied to the BC Supreme Court to determine whether the EMA applies to reserve lands.  Hemmera sought to dispose of this issue in advance of the trial (which is scheduled for September 2016).   Hemmera argued that the EMA is constitutionally inapplicable to all reserve lands in British Columbia.  The Court aplly  stated that: "this is a novel point and comes before the court as a matter of first instance."

The Court held that, in this case, it is not suitable to determine whether the EMA applies to reserve lands in advance of the trial, in part due to the novelty and broad implications of the issue.  Accordingly, it remains to be seen how this issue will unfold.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

ARTICLE
26 November 2015

Operation Of Landfills On Reserve Lands: Evolving Area Of The Law

Canada Real Estate and Construction
Contributor
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP logo
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm providing the world’s preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. The firm has more than 4,000 lawyers and other legal staff based in Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa and the Middle East.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More