ARTICLE
25 March 2024

LD Düsseldorf, 21 February 2024, Procedural Order On Counterclaim For Revocation, UPC_CFI_355/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Although the Statement of defence shall include a Counterclaim for revocation, the parties shall make use of the official forms available online. In practice, this means that the Counterclaim...
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

Official form for counterclaim of revocation shall be used

Although the Statement of defence shall include a Counterclaim for revocation, the parties shall make use of the official forms available online. In practice, this means that the Counterclaim for revocation must also be filed in the workflow provided for this purpose by the CMS. Only when this requirement has been met the Counterclaim for revocation is properly filed.

Time limit for filing the counterclaim for revocation may be extended

Where the defendant has filed a Statement of defence in due time in accordance with the requirements of Rule 25.1 RoP but could not file the Counterclaim for revocation in the dedicated workflow of the CMS in due time, the deadline may be extended retrospectively upon request (Rule 9.3 (a) RoP) and subject to the following conditions: Firstly, the defendant must have already made a first attempt to file the Counterclaim for revocation in due time in the workflow provided for this purpose before the expiry of the time limit. Secondly, the defendant must have uploaded the Counterclaim for revocation to the correct workflow without culpable delay after the expiry of the deadline.

Time limit for filing the rejoinder in main proceedings and defence to counterclaim for revocation may be extended

Where the claimant has only received the unredacted versions of all submissions and exhibits one week after defendant's deadline and where defendant consents to it, claimant can be granted a one week deadline extension.

2. Division

Düsseldorf Local Division

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_355/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement Action / Counterclaim for Revocation

5. Parties

Claimant: FUJIFILM Corporation

Defendants: Kodak GmbH; Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH; Kodak Holding GmbH

6. Patent(s)

EP 3 594 009 B1

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 9.3 (a) RoP, Rule 25.1 RoP, Rule 4.1 RoP, R.262A RoP

To view the full article click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
25 March 2024

LD Düsseldorf, 21 February 2024, Procedural Order On Counterclaim For Revocation, UPC_CFI_355/2023

Germany Intellectual Property

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More