ARTICLE
12 March 2024

LD, The Hague, February 13, 2024, Order, UPC_CFI_239/2023LD

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Even if both parties are start-ups or SMEs, both parties have a limited cash-flow, are competitors of each other and the claimant has limited financial capacities...
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

Each party must bear its own legal costs until a final decision and cost order is made

Even if both parties are start-ups or SMEs, both parties have a limited cash-flow, are competitors of each other and the claimant has limited financial capacities, each party must bear its own legal costs until a final decision and cost order is made.

Only exceptional circumstances, such as an abuse of rights, would warrant a cautio.

Imposing a cautio would effectively prevent SMEs and start-ups from enforcing their patent rights through the UPC, whereas it could enforce its right in several national courts within the EU without a cautio (such as in The Netherlands). This does not appear to be in line with one of the stated objectives of the UPCA to facilitate the enforcement of patent rights by SMEs.

2. Division

LD The Hague

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_239/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Main proceeding

No categories

5. Parties

Arkyne Technologies S.L. vs Plant-e Knowledge B.V. and Plant-e B.V.

6. Patent(s)

EP2137782

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 158 RoP, Art. 69 UPCA

To view the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

ARTICLE
12 March 2024

LD, The Hague, February 13, 2024, Order, UPC_CFI_239/2023LD

Germany Intellectual Property

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More