No Equal Pay For Temporary Agency Workers

LG
L&E Global

Contributor

L&E Global is spanning the globe and our member firms are ideally situated to provide clients with pragmatic, commercial advice necessary to achieve their objectives, wherever they operate. L&E Global’s members work closely with corporate, legal, human resources departments and corporate executives across a variety of sectors and industries to address the strategic and tactical issues that arise in the workplace
The plaintiff, a temporary agency worker in the retail sector, was seeking payment of a difference in wages compared to the remuneration of regular employees.
Germany Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The plaintiff, a temporary agency worker in the retail sector, was seeking payment of a difference in wages compared to the remuneration of regular employees. She argued that the applicable collective bargaining agreement resulting in the lower wages was a violation of the relevant EU Directive and the overall protection of temporary agency workers stipulated therein.

Following a judgment by the European Court of Justice (ECJ), the Federal Labour Court now found that the claimant was not entitled to the same remuneration as comparable regular employees of the company. According to German statutory law, a collective bargaining agreement can deviate from the principle of equal pay. The employer (temporary work agency) only has to pay the lower wage under the relevant collective bargaining agreement. This does not violate the EU Directive.

Although the claimant is in a worse position than comparable permanent employees due to lower hourly wages, the Directive permits this. This principle is however restricted by the requirements of the ECJ: a worse position is only permissible if another compensation benefit offsets such worse position. This can for example be achieved by the continued payment of wages even during periods when the employee is not assigned to customers. Such a compensation during non-assignment periods was provided for in the disputed collective bargaining agreement.

Finally, collective bargaining agreements must not result in wage that is lower than the minimum wage and any deviations from the equal pay principle are only possible during the first nine months of an assignment.

Practical Point

  • Whether continued payment during non-hiring periods actually neutralises a lower payment in monetary terms is likely to depend on the individual case. However, the ECJ and the Federal Labour Court do not focus solely on the monetary aspect. When it comes to offsetting, the essential working and employment conditions are what counts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More